Antinational

I’m anti-national and I know it ,before anyone accuses me of it I accept it already.
Indian air-force killed 350+ terrorists overnight and they deserve praise at every possible level

And yet I’m not quite happy.

And before you call me a terrorist sympathizer I quite openly and bluntly say it, the fact that most terrorists are from a particular ideology. And that  wahabi interpretation of islam is propagating terrorism. It cannot be denied, you’re an illiberal idiot if you deny it.

 

There is one line in movie imitation game, where Benedict Cumberbatch gets punched , and he says which I’m paraphrasing, “I’m a pacifist I’m agnostic to violence, great thing about violence is it feels good, sometimes we shouldn’t do what feels good. Because what is good may not always be logical. What will the Germans think if we divert our convoy suddenly? “

 

In game of thrones, spoiler alert, Robb stark lost half of his army because he beheaded Lord karstark,who murdered two enemy kids,because the enemies killed his two sons. So a grieving father took revenge- and felt good about it. What did Robb stark do ? For feeling of righteousness and justice he did do justice and stayed strict to his morals , he didn’t even feel good about it, but did it anyway and it costed him lives of thousands of soldiers and his family got nearly extinct. Because his step was not logical.  

 

If my father were in army and he was killed by these jihadis,then it might be possible that I would have been on revenge-hate spree too, it’s easy and understandable to be sentimental here. Law and justice system exist so that we may not all become murderers in taking revenge.

Entire nation was sad and mourning and angry on Pakistan for attack on the crpf convoy, killing 44 soldiers on 14 feb. Now everyone is super happy

And I am worried.

Why worried ?

I am worried about several things.

This was a surgical strike ,not on terrorist but on core issues unemployment, hunger, poverty, religious animosity all issues wiped out by one strike. People will not vote on reasons but on sentiments and this will cause India to suffer for more years to come.

Is the life of 350 terrorist worth screwing an entire nation for several more years ?

I think airforce doesn’t care about internal politics and they shouldn’t either.

Will killing 350 terrorist solve Kashmir issue ? No.

Will the core issues of india will be solved ? No.

Will Pakistan become sane and stop sending terrorist to india ? No.

Will this strike end terrorism ? Most probably no.

Will it fulfill our desire of vengeance,revenge and  blood-lust ? Yes.

Will it make modi pm again ? Most probably yes.

It’s easy to start a war, but no one can pin point where and when it will end and at what cost.

Our dear neighbour is already a ruined economy , India has better socio-economic conditions than all it’s neighbours , we have most to lose if it escalates into war. Pakistan will only lose people and we know it can breed like rats and grow back , with the same hateful ideology. We will lose even if we win the war.

 

Will this one step pushed my country closer to war ?maybe yes

We’ll have to see how pakistan defense and army react to that , will Pak media show it as 350 terrorist or 350 civilians?

How will China react ? our immediate neighbours are our concern australia is sitting thousands of miles away cannot help us immediately in case of an attack from china.

What will be the reaction of kashmiri people how will they perceive it ? we’ll have to wait for the air of propaganda to be clear.

 

So what do I suggest ? Do nothing ?

Nope not at all.

In Fact I am not criticizing the move

I’m worried about consequences, because common ignorant people do not think

They cannot think logically especially in these situations where emotional stakes are so damm high.

Also 350 dead terrorist or any type of casualty is being denied by Pakistan military, Indian air Force has just said about strike on jEM camps, they said nothing about 350 terrorist , we don’t know from where our media got it’s numbers.

 

This surgical strike 2.0 was so good that it even removed discussions of high profile ram mandir from media coverage. (Supreme Court is finally relieved that they are not being pressurized by media anymore for prompt construction of the temple).

 

i saw time lit fest 2018 debate of tavleen, faye and barkha on metoo movement. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nblNjiEbm8Q&t=2954s)
and i like the rational view points presented by all three of them.
the first symptom of finding an irrational point/blind spot is when the voice starts to raise.

till last night i was familiar with barkha and tavleen
when i was 10 i started watching barkha in jai jawan on ndtv she was fabulous and i liked her a lot, made me cry several times with her stories.
when i was 24 i started reading tavleen singh, in indian express, because she made a joke about communists in JNU beheading her
and i found that funny (and i didn’t find communism problematic at all that time, i have huge range of humor),
while next day a few students in indian express raised the topic of her insensitivity.
then i started reading more of her, it was disappointing to see her support for modi, i thought of her as just another modi bhakt
but she isn’t and she wasn’t , she was talking reasonably while witnessing the abuse of power by INC , and having modi proved innocent by SIT
about gujarat case (because you have to start believing some institution of justice, she did believe SIT) and she also witnessed the SIT
who probed rajiv gandhi for bofors and she also witnessed the brutal killings of sikhs by INC in delhi in 1984 , of which the congress has still
not apologized and not take action against, overall she has made me a saner, more rational person , introduced me to the merits of capitalism
i disagree with her on many things, but i see the logic and reasoning behind that, which is solid , fact based.
faye i found last night when she logically roasted members of bajrang dal and i found her cold tone of roasting very pleasing , after several months i’ve found someone new, she appears to be rational so far. (tavleen has a blindspot too, like she despises nepotism and socialism so much – i understand the socialism thing now, i hate it too , it just pleases the ears, feels good , doesn’t work at all- she saw through the fake secularism of congress which is also true, but she was unable to percieve the hate that the right wing will bring with it, i saw it miles away the religious bullying supremacy of right versus the appeasement secularism of commies and left and congis and sociaists) she couldn’t see that the hatred against sikhs in congress was not religious one, the pogrom ended and hate for sikhs is not abundant in congress, the same cannot be said about the bjp, the hatred for muslimsruns down from parents organization rss to all its subsidiaries of hate mongering and religious discrimination and tavleen failed to see 1984 was immediate responsive revenge pogromas opposed to 2002 hindu-muslims slow cold planned riots for political gains, which built from hatred of gandhi-his love for islamic theology and his and the liberal’s complete ignorance of  violence and massacres of hindus by hands of muslims. this is plain cold hatred , tavleen turned a blind eye to that in 2014, just citing 1984 isn’t enough , you have to dig deeper)

now i’ve seen view of tavleen, watched faye, but i also watched the debate between barkha and ayaan hirsi ali, ayaan i love and respect a lot,
is very graceful lady and perhaps one of the bravest lady in this world. to be honest barkha was super annoying in the debate
i know she fights passionately, but her passion blinds her to obvious facts and reasoning on the other side.
i even saw her debate with tavleen on ndtv, tavleen was graceful (not lady like but gentle , speaking on their turn – the civil discussion type)
barkha on the other hand took everything personally and was super annoying, that day i decided never to watch barkha, having insulted two ladies
whom i respect a lot, because of their logic and reasoning.

that was for intro coming to debate, i agree with all 3 ladies on metoo debate, i agree we have to ensure work place safety of women, we have to teach
men and boys about consent and i also agree tavleen’s statement of the whiny women who used their sexuality to advance in their career, and i also
agree with barkha and faye’s view that 23 year old women have no clue whom to complain what to complain, they are being harassed by bosses,
punished for speaking up and if they go to police, they will be harassed by police. i also agree with tavleen’s point of these whiny women
taking up spaces that belong to more important topic of rape and child abuse, this is true, the movement is in a way elitist
because it deals with only the harassment part that educated women experience, education is not available to girls in village
however it doesn’t give license to men to grope women. barkha was right in one more point that if you do not stop them here
you are letting patriarchy rule, the men will be fearless next time and will attempt more, if left unpunished. so there needs to be stopping of that
else its’s a slippery slope to rape. tavleen was also correct when she said women were offered celebrity covering jobs
because they refused to go to field and cover up riots and political rallies, but she was completely oblivious to the fact that reporting these things
a woman journalist has to struggle more than a man, man can go easily, but a woman will face grouping in a political rally
and that is why they refuse to cover these sort of things. people are and will be equating rapes of little girls with grouping
if grouped women, economically capable, get more screen time than girls who got raped, barkha and faye missed this tinsy little logical point.
the reason i decided to write this whole mess of ideas and reaction is when tavleen made a joke about faye being dressed as a man, now i understood the intent
of the joke, and the joke was unfunny but faye and barkha took offense, as if she had said something incredibly stupid, which she obviously didn’t.
the perpetrators of metoo have to acknowledge some flaws in the movement itself , it is restricted to the educated class, of women who know their rights and can
potentially misuse it, although the number is low, but it exist. second thing is stop mob lynchings of accused, the media trials must stop, we cannot listen to
just one side of story and punish someone. i mean you can never ever prove a 20 year old rape case, ever. and it will never happen that the rapist acknowledge
that he did it and by court of law he (and minimally a she) would be free to go. metoo if it wants to bring any change in the structure of society has to think
of a solution to this problem, how can you prove charges of grouping? marital rape? verbal abuse? and 20 year old rape cases cctvs are not present everywhere ,
because a due process is required to distinguish fact from fiction. the only positive thing i see from metoo,so far in india
is that educated women now know that they can speak up, it has given a platform to them, while it has also made some unreasonable things , shouting/scolding is not
same as verbal abuse, its a battle of equality which will never be equal, purely because of some physical limitations nature put on us. if only men were able to
bear child or were more emotionally developed or had periods and were generally physically weaker, then we could have talked about absolute equality.
i am aware the physically weaker thing will hurt you ladies, because we are talking IN GENERAL doesn’t matter if you put me in front of a 100 pound female wrestler
she will beat me up obviously, but that won’t and can’t discard the fact that on average one is weaker and one is not. and that will lead to some works that men will
be bound to do more than women, drilling up coal mine or taking up gas cylinder or a heavy box 20 floors up. there are women who do that, but fewer.. for a reason.

the metoo movement hangs in middle of what is and what not is to be taken as offensive ?
you dare criticize the movement in front of a feminist ? i as a boy (shit i am a man now 25 years old) cannot do that, i will be mansplaining stuff to them,
whenever someone says this word in front of me, i always say this in my mind : “fuck off you retarded bitch!”.
you can be tolerate pinches on bottom, attempt to kiss etc (which by the way is what bollywood heroes taught men)
or you can be completely intolerant of even the jokes , one reason i am disgusted by american left-democrats is their utter complete inability to take jokes
and this same ghost followed the metoo movement here, everything is labelled as a sexist racist thing. they are over sensitive and over passionate about this
your battle is to break the mental barriers of patriarchy , it is not to penalize people for telling jokes, while i acknowledge there are stupid men
making joke of feminism and metoo and making sexist remark all the time, i think it is upto understanding of women to not take everything on offense
we need to change the nature of our abuses, its mostly directed towards females, but that does not mean we shut down people completely,
breaking mental barriers and making room for comedy requires acceptance of comedy, be it religion or be it patriarchy or be it wait for it…. feminism.
by feminism i mean the 3rd wave in western world.
If you cannot take joke about something (not necessarily feminism, but everything) you are being unreasonable at best and an oversensitive bitch at worst.
and the joke has not to be at an expense of someone’s individual suffering and trauma. can’t make a joke on rape victims. dark humor is different category
it is called dark for a reason, for the same reason black people were enslaved. dark humor has to, must have one thing
its a must… that both concerning parties, the one making the joke and the one listening the joke mutually agree that either of them are not in anyway mocking
the actual suffering. this mutual agreement is what makes dark humor fascinating to those who love it and offensive to people like barkha and thatwokegirl and several other 3rd wave feminists who are annoyed
at even a glimpse of their self assumed patriarchy when a man talks about being reasonable . and before you accuse me of being a chauvinistic pig, i blame men more than women, i am of thought that women are not better than men but men are worse than women these two statement are different and you’re an idiot if you think they both mean same, also  the world would have been in much better place and shape if it were ruled by women.

this is against all the memers doing pkmkb
fuck every single one of you , you imbecile unthinking retarded cowards.
(i will take criticism only from people whom i deem are intellectually capable of criticizing me with logic and sensibility , most of you
i am sorry to say , fall below that standard, you are not mentally equipped to deal with logic and cannot keep facts from sentiment , yes you the kashmiri memer)

while i bombard pakistan with tonnes of insults ,i leave no stupidity behind.
the memers saying pak had to, had to release the wing commander, it had no choice so we must not celebrate their “goodwill”
if it was that obvious why were you worried and praying about safe return of that commander in the first place ?
weren’t terror strike celebrating indians silent on 27th feb when the news of our 1 pilot being captured broke out?
why the fuck were you all silent and not celebrating like before you fucking simpletons

while terrorism is an islamic problem , its an ideological war, pakistan may most probably be a piece of shit country with about 10% extremists and radicals
and 50-60% islamic theocracy/supremacy supporters, who will behead-lynch you for drawing muhammad and his cartoons,
cyber bullies and mob lynchers who are not fucking tolerant of criticism of islam in any form, and shows their fake nationalist supremacy over ind,
claiming they are better than india.they still cannot be dragged into a war like situation. their problem is ideology. you cannot kill an ideology, ideas are bulletproof.
i would be killed immediately in paksitan for the things i have said about islam, allah and prophet muhammad.
i criticize their actions and blame it directly on things muhammad condoned , actions he took and and wars he himself waged.
by chance of nature i was thankfully not born there and unfortunately here i have some rights here, and it means i will use my right to criticize whatever shit is going on in my country
and these 17 year old kids are disgrace to this already degraded education system.
we are breeding more morons for future, these so called new generation intellectual dank memers who fail their 12th. the people who do not understand the value of life
are the only ones taking about war as solution,
suggest some ways to stop terrorism ? if you are saying say no to #saynotowar and endorse #saynototerrorism, suggest some ways
do you think killing a few thousand terrorist will solve the problem of terrorism , you fucking moron ?
what do you know about terrorism ? and how does it propagates ? its an ideology you nincompoop. you cannot kill an ideology with war
look at afgahnistan iraq , how peaceful they are after decades of war and destruction and look at how many millions it killed in both countries
how many soldiers died in combat, of USA. do you not realize, unilateral action on terrorism is possible, only and only with option without war.
if you go to war, they already got nothing to lose you fucking idiot. you have everything to lose here, your culture, your economy
your economy.
you are only counting bodies when you say that without war also we have equally dead soldiers in 20 fucking years.
20 fucking years, and 10 days of war had same casualties and you have the balls to equate this motherfucker ?
do you even think you bastard ?
think of the economic cost, think of all all all the budget cut, we already have minimum spending on education and health. think of all the unnecessary
weapons your government will import for fighting , a long war whose ending is uncertain ? and do you think a nuclear war is possible you asshat?
don’t you know a war will orphan many many children who will be ready again to fight those who killed their parents ? whether the parents were terrorist or not,
they will be angry on you.
and if you are asking about daily surgical strikes, well do it, daily it will only kill terrorist, it won’t end terrorism.
i do not object in killing of terrorist, fuck them, kill them hang them rape them do whatever with them, all i care about a solution with least casualties on both sides.
only deaths i want is of terrorists, and it will be only reduced in numbers when both fight together. i know its impossible given the isi’s role in promoting terrorism
but the talk has to start somewhere, 4 wars and thousand of dead soldiers aren’t enough for you ? you insensitive cuck.
why not you elect better politicians ? rather than demanding war from politicians that you elected ? and i am not a communist tmc congi sp bsp rjd jdu aaptard , these parties have all caused
harm to india and the soul of india.

first of all, i live in india – a democratic secular republic – of 1.31 billion people (as of 2018)

and for security reasons i can’t reveal my name or my background information, i’ll leave limited information about miself in upcoming blogs. only that i was born in hindi speaking parts of country.

i am writing blogs, knowing no one will read it, i am not doing it for fame or publicity

i just want to dump my brain here, i have some feasible practical solutions for some of large problems in our society, i have been reliably told by several intellectuals that my solutions are like killing three birds with one stone ( or is it two birds, i don’t know 😀 )

there will be mild sarcasm, i don’t prefer to use comedy while discussing serious matters.

i usually do not prefer labels , it grounds people into certain biases. in particular  i do not associate myself with any group, i try to keep things to individual level.

but certain things i am – i am disbeliever in gods and religions, i am not only an atheist, but also an anti-theist (anti-theism means i not only disbelieve in god(s) but also Believe that the concept of god is unnecessary at best and harmful at worst, and that religions (mainly 3) are regressive to entire humankind.

i studied three religions in particular , hinduism – the one in which i was born, christianity – the school was run by christian missionaries and islam – the one religion which brought me to this intellect level.

i am fierce opponent of sexual harassment, i am totally for equality of women, their rights, their education, equal treatment and ardent supporter of strong independent women, but i am not a feminist, the modern day the third wave feminism is retarded in my opinion. (i will write more on feminism and my sexist side too, i believe 3 type of feminism exist right now- the western one, the indian one (which is required) and the middle eastern one (even the 3rd wave toxic feminism will be better than what they have right now), and 4th one is the one where i think women are better than men.

i am not a communist, not a socialist either, i am a left leaning centrist, who is in favour of compassionate capitalism and acknowledge faults with both socialism and capitalism.

i think the closest to compassionate capitalism is regulated market capitalism,i am pro taxes, tax everything even water (we waste a lot of water here – i am sorry its the only way) tax everyone, reduce taxes on rich increase taxes on conglomerates, decrease taxes on small and medium sector industries, i for reducing bureaucracy and want to reduce government spending.

i do not support or defend any political party, i used to support one but now i bash everyone, its rather more fun. i don’t care who is prime minister or who is in opposition.

if you are hurting people, i am against you.

i do not support congress-bjp-ncp-sp-bsp-rjd-jdu-aap-cpi(m)-tmc-shivsena (these are major political parties of the cow belt of india (yes we have a cow belt, like usa has a bible belt)

i can’t bear people crying, i really want to do good for people, but neither i have money nor resources and my life is in peril too.  but i still care to make things right.

i am not  a nationalist, i am mild to zero patriotic, i believe in planting trees, i am not a vegan, infact i find faults in every group, even the climate change activists.

i am not with separatists or naxalites, i am not a muslim sympathiser, i understand the problem of terrorism and naxalism and i call the terrorists what they are islamic terrorist (and i know difference between fundamentalism, extremism and islamism, brahminism) i am not an ambdekarite. i bash hindu as well as muslim beliefs. i am against rss-hindu mahasabha, isis taliban al qaeda. i am pro israel even though i acknowledge their madness in occupying west bank, but i also recognize hamas as a terrorist group and that palestinians deserve freedom from israel, while israel deserves her land now that we cannot expel one group without killing millions.

i find problems in every group that takes itself too seriously and i distance myself from them, i am not sentimentally attached to one particular group, however i hate some groups more than other, especially the ones who claim moral high ground. i.e. i hate some groups more passionately, like the NRBRIs living in west, moderate muslims , virat hindus, butt hurt communists etc

i am strictly secular, don’t care what your religion is, till you keep it private to yourself, the moment you open your mouth ,or use loud speaker or threaten your own kids, it becomes problematic, i.e. the moment you start infringing on human rights of others.

i oppose some american groups too, even though it doesn’t help me in any way

i am mildly anti guns, pro abortions, anti blm, anti blue/all lives matter, anti kkk, anti climate changer deniers, anti chemtrail people, anti flat earthers, anti antifluoride group, anti creationists, anti religion, anti -antivax people, , anti moon landing deniers, anti rothschilde conspiracy theorists, anti 9/11 deniers, anti-anarchists, anti-pronoun retardation game crybabies , anti gaypride parades (where straight people act like gays , even involve in public indecency) , anti-3rd wave feminism, anti racism , anti sexism, anti bigotry and hypocrisy (i acknowledge there is hypocrisy everywhere, but some degree, like 5% is tolerable limit) i am very much pro science super stretching theory or the big bang and evolution is my favorite (and i know difference between scientific theory, hypothesis and non scientific use of the word theory). i think everything in nature is non binary {there is no clear cut boundary in nature} with a notable exception of gender in human beings, (like i am 90-95% sure there are 2 genders,for 5% doubt i’ll allow you one more at max 3, the common or no gender, not more than that.)

i am staunch supporter of LGBTQ people and their rights. i am against celebs who claim to be trans, without having any surgeries- gender dysphoria, hollywood is filled with leftists elites, some of them are retarded. i am pro death penalty especially for gang rapists. i want to bash head of people with steel rod who say pedophilia is a type of sexuality and form of love.

however i oppose democrats as well as republicans,  i sit in centre, taking good from both sides and discarding the things i find bad or unreasonable. i hate trumptards as well as hillary and these days bernie supporters ( i supported bernie a in 2015). i find some rationality in arguments of ben shapiro, dave rubin, jordan petersen and i don’t take milo yinnapolous seriously, i know the guy is a troll, however these all fall when it comes to religion ,almost entirely and climate change discredit for shapiro’s case. i think islamophobia is one bullshit term, like mansplaining, i am anti illegal immigration. its simple if someone bases their argument based on reason and not sentiments, i can listen critically. i don’t care about atheism either, i am not of belief that atheists are some bright fellas, big bang was discovered by  a father at vatican, human genome project carried out by a christian who wanted to disprove evolution but ended up proving it even more, solidifying it. atheists just believe in one less lie than religious people. i have seen people who claim to be atheist but believe in ghosts, in astrology, in homoepathy, in spirituality, in castes etc, i have seen even sharia supporting atheist ffs. so being atheist does not automatically qualify you for intelligence and hardwork.

coming back to india, i personally think caste system is huge problem, its a bane to our growth , i am both for and against reservation. my aim is to reduce socio-economic divide among lower and upper castes while developing a sustainable long term solution reducing if not removing caste system.

and i personally believe educated people of this country the graduates , the degree holders are real problem, not the 30% illiterate people but the literate people who don’t do anything, anything at all. 400 million people are illiterate – they have almost no voice, no representation, 400 million are semi literate – the turbulent ones , and 400 million are literate and the problematic ones.

i am also of belief that hinduism cannot be separated from indian culture, and this is one of the main reasons for our sluggish backward society. people define hinduism as umbrella of beliefs, i define it as onion of beliefs. a single individual has a thousand beliefs, you cannot make them change their mind, religion can be reduced if only they (educated people) did the critical thinking themselves. you keep peeling the layers will never end, and that’s with just one person, there are millions more, so its smart to not try to change people. i have read, objectively, gita, quran and bible in hope of finding answers and ended up as an atheist after reading them.

i also hate whatever is in mainstream not because i want to be cool by that, but because whatever is in the mainstream , people tend to turn a blind eye to the bad, no one in the celeb/populist culture is all good, i do not expect them to be good, we are all grey shady zone, of good and bad, i just don’t want the bad to be ignored, it makes average people turn into monsters.

now i know this blog will not have any audience, and i really don’t care, i just want to preserve my ideas. in case i die, the ideas must live. they can be improved upon, to make lives of people better.